Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocco Lampone (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, default to keep. The article is in a bad state which may qualify for deletion, but appears to be saveable. Since I can't see any harm leaving it on Wikipedia, I'll just leave it there awaiting future editors' input. A cleanup is recommended. --Der yck C. 20:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

=[[Rocco Lampone]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocco Lampone}}

:{{la|Rocco Lampone}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Rocco Lampone}})

Unsourced, cannot be sourced, since no reliable sources exist to have this be a standalone article. Beresford 77 (talk) 00:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Comment. Here's what I think - I think we could make a case for merging all of these Godfather characters (or at least the minor ones) into one List of characters from The Godfather or some such. Then people would keep expanding the entries until they were too big for a list. And then, we'd have to split them out again. The alternative is to find sources now - and I can't believe that there aren't sources that talk about the characters. I'll see what I can dig up. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Keep. No good solution here, for a fictional character with somewhat different portrayals in three different notable fictional platforms. Sourcing problems can be addressed. Better an article like this than an attempt to establish a Corleone canon. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:19, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.