Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodent of unusual size

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

=[[Rodent of unusual size]]=

The result was redirect, early close per WP:SNOW and comes off as a humor page as noted by Borock (non-admin closure) Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

:{{la|Rodent of unusual size}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rodent_of_unusual_size Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Rodent of unusual size}})

I can find no evidence that any of the comparatively large rodents on this page are actually ever referred to by the phrase "rodent of unusual size", or that anything in the world is, other than the fictional creature from The Princess Bride. I would delete this page and redirect to The Princess Bride. bd2412 T 04:11, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Redirect to The Princess Bride, with a tip of the hat to the Giant Rat of Sumatra. This phrase is indelibly linked to the movie. Even the [http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/rodents-of-unusual-size-do-exist-1-180949027/?no-ist Smithsonian magazine] thinks so. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:31, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to The Princess Bride. This article seems to be a borderline joke when it says the expression "can also be used" to describe various species, with the protest rat being the punchline. I guess that would fall under WP:OR. Borock (talk) 15:58, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.