Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Mehta (2nd nomination)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Rohit Mehta}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Rohit Mehta}})

Fails NACTOR. Google reveals various hits on another person of the same name who is a crypto CEO of some sort, and various other actors with the same first name, before this person even shows up (and it's a passing mention in a gossip rag). Sources in the article are gossip or primary. Previously deleted as A7 and G5, though I of course can't see why that is. Fermiboson (talk) 11:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and India. Fermiboson (talk) 11:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination, you beat me to it, thanks. All I can find about him is a few gossip pages about his wedding, and obvious paid placement. In case you're still wondering about the G5 deletion from the last AFD, it was User:Abh01, a sockpuppet of User:Amansharma111, and this one will probably be flushed down the same pipe. Note that it was originally created as Rohit (Indian Actor) before I moved it to his actual name. Two weeks ago it was Rohit (Indian actor). Wikishovel (talk) 12:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising and Himachal Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 13:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
• Delete: This doesn’t even need a nomination. Creator is a sockpuppet per G5. Nonetheless, it is wholly promotional with only a few sources that do not make it notable enough. HarukaAmaranth ^春_香 14:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
• Delete and salt - non-notable actor; page repeatedly recreated by likely undisclosed paid sockpuppets. This version was also created by a sockpuppet and is similar enough to the most recent deleted version (there are several) that it would qualify for G4 deletion had there been a complete deletion discussion, and would be eligible for G5 deletion if not for subsequent substantive editing. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
• :Seconding suggestion to salt, if that matters. Fermiboson (talk) 03:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
• Delete - References are mainly tabloid type references and nothing that shows either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. I would say leave the AfD open instead of a G5 so we can discuss support for SALTING the page due to the WP:TENDENTIOUS attempts to re-create the page. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
• Delete: Mainly junk, tabloid references, created by a sock, name-dropping - strike three, page is out. Ravensfire (talk) 21:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
• Delete: per above. --Tumbuka Arch (talk) 08:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.