Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rondo Hatton Classic Horror Awards

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:54, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

=[[Rondo Hatton Classic Horror Awards]]=

:{{la|Rondo Hatton Classic Horror Awards}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rondo_Hatton_Classic_Horror_Awards Stats])

:({{Find sources|Rondo Hatton Classic Horror Awards}})

fails WP:GNG. most of the coverage is PR style. [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=au&biw=1280&bih=843&tbs=ar%3A1&tbm=nws&q=%22Rondo+Hatton+Classic+Horror+Awards%22&oq=%22Rondo+Hatton+Classic+Horror+Awards%22&gs_l=serp.3...36330.36924.0.37143.3.3.0.0.0.0.187.515.0j3.3.0...0.0...1c.1j2.wfXparH6IIY]. LibStar (talk) 00:36, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Delete an award by an unknown organisation (Classic Horror Film Board) with the following website: http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/ Mootros (talk) 02:21, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:20, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Delete - classic promo-spam. One of the "sources" is the company's website, one is from an award winner (you would have to question how "independent" that is) and the other two are blogs. There is nothing to suggest the subject meets WP:GNG. The only other mentions of the awards that I could find seem to be other organisations encouraging their readers / viewers / etc, to nominate them for an award. Would need a lot more coverage to be considered notable, in my opinion. Cheers, Stalwart111 (talk) 03:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.