Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roses in the Hospital

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam ^Sing! 18:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

=[[Roses in the Hospital]]=

:{{la|Roses in the Hospital}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Roses_in_the_Hospital Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Roses in the Hospital}})

The UK charting appears to be the only thing qualifying this as notable, and I don't believe that this is enough. Lachlan Foley (talk) 10:47, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Keep per WP:NSONG - "1.Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts". If the nom doesn't think this is enough to pass notability, then they should raise a RFC. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 14:35, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Keep - assuming the source is reliable, it exists and appears to have charted. Bearian (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.