Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rostislav Bogoslevsky

:{{la|Rostislav Bogoslevsky}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rostislav Bogoslevsky}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Rostislav Bogoslevsky}})

• Delete BLP issues - only alleged, no proof SlaughteredSnakes (talk) 05:05, 24 March 2010 (UTC)SlaughteredSnakes
• Keep - The article says "believed by police" and "suspected", and the sources back it up, therefore there are no BLP issues. The citations constitute significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Serial killers (and suspected serial killers) are typically deemed to not be caught by WP:BLP1E due to the scope of their crimes, the wide media coverage, and the drawn out nature of the criminal justice system keeping them in the public spotlight. Please note that his name is also spelled "Rotislav Bogoslavsky" and there's further sources under that name such as [http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=997270 this one]. There's reason to believe there will be further foreign language sources that may not be easily found by English speakers. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:21, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silverseren^C 06:11, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

• Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silverseren^C 06:11, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep I added in some links. It looks to be a notable serial killer. Silverseren^C 06:11, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

:*Comment. The subject may or may not be notable, but you shouldn't be referring to him as a serial killer, rather than a suspected serial killer, either in the article or in this discussion. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:09, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::"Suspected", fine. It doesn't change anything though. Silverseren^C 20:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
• DeleteNN 'single event' alleged criminal. Even if indicted, why should this deserve a WP page? Not all criminals get pages. --Shuki (talk) 23:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

:Because it is not a single event. A serial killer, by definition, is not a single event killer. Silverseren^C 23:09, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete. Not notable - Does not meet qualifications for notability - Not a serial killer, only suspected with 2 murders

According to WP: "A serial killer is a person who murders three or more people over a period of more than thirty days"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_killer

--SuperHappyPerson (talk) 03:09, 26 March 2010 (UTC)SuperHappyPerson

:(Even though i'm not going to get a response from this user) Well, he's not a spree killer either, because that means there is little to no time in between the murders and these were drawn out over a period of a month. I suppose you could classify him as a mass murderer, since that has no exact number above 1. I think police are calling him a serial killer because it was spread out across a month and he did attempt to kill a third person, so he loosely meet those qualifications. And then the whole cat thing... Silverseren^C 22:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

• Delete Two murders does not a serial killer make, and sadly committing two murders isn't necessarily notable. The cat killing is disturbing, but this still doesn't rise to the level of notability needed for an article here. AniMate 07:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.