Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rotterdam techno
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Without prejudice to recreation as a redirect, if a suitable target is established. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:19, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
=[[Rotterdam techno]]=
:{{la|Rotterdam techno}} – (
:({{Find sources|Rotterdam techno}})
No evidence of notability in any reliable sources. A google search has not turned up anything reliable to support notability. SabreBD (talk) 21:39, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Gabber (music). "Rotterdam techno" is usually considered a synonym. This article is oddly Japan-centric; if a notable scene has appeared in Japan and that can be substantiated with reliable sources, then that information should be added to the main article, but nothing here is sourced so no need for a merge at this point. — Gwalla | Talk 22:07, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Gabber (music) is a redirect, so that should be Mainstream hardcore. Or maybe Early hardcore, which is what gabber redirects to. It's kind of a mess. — Gwalla | Talk 20:26, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.