Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Route 666 (2009 Film)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Obvious insertion of misinformation. Keegantalk 05:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[Route 666 (2009 Film)]]=

:{{la|Route 666 (2009 Film)}} ([{{fullurl:Route 666 (2009 Film)|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Route 666 (2009 Film)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Delete - I can find no reliable sources to verify the existence of this film (at least in the version described in the article). It's not in IMDB, and the official site is on Freewebs. ... discospinster talk 02:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith talk 03:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Hello ok the website is on freewebs but thats because we just announced this movie today but we have a webmaster doing to the movie site right now and this movie is all over myspace forms and we have made it a myspace it has over million profile views already would you like the link for proof. --Madden09 (talk) 02:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello is anybody there???

ummm I dont know what else you want for proof we just submited this movie in the imdb datebase it takes 2 weeks for them to recieve it. So no imdb number until they give it to us.

Anymore questions? --Madden09 (talk) 03:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete The article was deleted as a G3 a few hours ago Route 666 (2009 film). This article isn't blatant and obvious misinformation, it may well be true. Though until reliable sources are availiable to show verifiability it should be deleted. RMHED (talk) 03:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete This is a hoax by someone who thinks making pages about Troy Rodriguez is funny. ( which it was, the first time ) PirateArgh!!1! 03:36, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh really oh := ummm all right I think that that is a real person like a actor he is new in the buisness I think idk but anyway why is the page being deleted? --Madden09 (talk) 03:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

* 22:37, August 3, 2008 ESkog (Talk | contribs) deleted "Troy M Rodriguez" ‎ (G5: Creation by a banned user)

* 09:39, July 26, 2008 ESkog (Talk | contribs) deleted "Troy M Rodriguez" ‎ (G5: Creation by a banned user)

* 20:44, June 26, 2008 ESkog (Talk | contribs) deleted "Troy M Rodriguez" ‎ (A7 nn-bio; in addition, this is an obvious hoax/person who cannot tell fiction from reality)

* 14:17, June 26, 2008 Kevin (Talk | contribs) deleted "Troy M Rodriguez" ‎ (R2: Redirect from the article namespace to Talk, User, or User talk)

PirateArgh!!1! 03:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete as blatant misinformation; such a film with that director's name would definitely have Google hits, no matter what. It may be worth exploring an indefinite block for creating hoax articles. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 04:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete G3. As Erik says, if John Carpenter were involved in this project, there would be evidence of it all over the place. Obvious "blatant and obvious misinformation". Deor (talk) 04:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.