Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rowan Peacock

:{{la|Rowan Peacock}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rowan_Peacock Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Rowan Peacock}})

Delete: non-notable athlete. Quis separabit? 12:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

• Keep Meets WP:NCYC ("Competed at the Olympics or UCI World Championships or UCI World Cup") and as an Olympian, they're all notable per WP:NOLYMPICS. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:56, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
• Delete; Olympians are always notable. Nyttend (talk) 13:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

:*Oops, meant to type keep. Not sure how "delete" came out. Nyttend (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

• Keep. Keep as an Olympic athlete. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

• Keep as this is obviously notable and acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 05:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
• Keep since Olympians are generally presumed to pass the notability threshold. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 12:32, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
• Keep – Presumed notable as per WP:NOLYMPICS. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.