Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Cammarano

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Roy Cammarano]]=

:{{la|Roy Cammarano}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Roy_Cammarano Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Roy Cammarano}})

promotional article for non-notable business. Author of two non-notable books, both self published. DGG ( talk ) 15:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:NAUTHOR. Two decent links comes close to GNG, but probably not enough there either. South Nashua (talk) 17:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Delete - He's non-notable and it's a vanity page.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 19:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete appears to fail WP:NAUTHOR. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete As above, it appears to fail WP:NAUTHOR.Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete: per NAUTHOR. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.