Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rozz Rezabek

:{{la|Rozz Rezabek}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rozz_Rezabek Stats])

:({{Find sources|Rozz Rezabek}})

Doesn't seem sufficiently notable to me — although I admit that the genre in question is way out of my area of expertise. Any notability appears to be completely related to Courtney Love and Kurt Cobain without any independence, and the bands that he was in also appear to be insufficiently notable (and I am including them in the discussion. Delete all. --Nlu (talk) 19:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

• {{la|Negative Trend}}
• {{la|Theatre of Sheep}}

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

• Definte keep for Negative Trend - plenty of coverage in GBooks (why didn't the nom find it? Some are even listed in the article) and elsewhere (Allmusic reviews, staff review from Punknews, etc.), in addition to the book already cited. I don't see any valid reason to delete there. Weak keep for Theatre of Sheep. There's an article [http://www.wweek.com/portland/blog-22760-the_last_pogo_portlands_old_new_wave_champions_the.html here] plus the track in the film - Google News archive may find more when it's back. As for the Rozz Rezabek article, I think a selective merge to Negative Trend would be in order. --Michig (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
• Note. I have just added AfD templates to the Theatre of Sheep and Negative Trend articles as the nominator failed to do this. Consider the seven days to start here. --Michig (talk) 21:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 08:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

---

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:16, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

---

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.