Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rude Boy USA

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. So Why 12:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Rude Boy USA]]=

:{{la|Rude Boy USA}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rude_Boy_USA Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Rude Boy USA}})

Unimportant series of books by a non-notable author. No reviews in any significant publications. Edwardx (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:45, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:45, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TheMagnificentist 15:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Keep. There are plenty of independent sources which devoted sufficient column space to reviewing the trilogy. Nowhere in Wikipedia policies or guidelines does it say every book has to have appeared in The New York Review of Books before it can be considered notable. —GrammarFascist _contribs ^talk 00:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.