Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudolph Flowers

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Rudolph Flowers}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudolph Flowers}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Rudolph Flowers}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:33, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Rudolph Flowers]]=

:{{la|1=Rudolph Flowers}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Rudolph Flowers}})

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Belize. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:12, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.