Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Running Home
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Running Home}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Running Home}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Running Home}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 14:14, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Running Home]]=
:{{la|1=Running Home}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Running Home}})
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no suitable or reliable sources or reviews to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE. The Film Creator (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete There's very little there to establish notability, and very little out there in the cold, bleak world either... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.