Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rusif Huseynov

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Rusif Huseynov}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rusif Huseynov}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Rusif Huseynov}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. plicit 13:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Rusif Huseynov]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Rusif Huseynov}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Rusif Huseynov}})

So I came across this on the Turkish Wikipedia, where it's currently also nominated for deletion. The versions in other languages have been created in early-October by the same person, and the articles are an exact copy of each other.

The problem is that this article cites a shit ton of sources, none of which actually contribute to WP:GNG. Most are published on websites which he works for, so these are not independent. The half of the sources are his own news articles anyways. A beforehand search doesn't result in much either. Pretty obvious attempt of refbombing their way into having an article.

Also, why must every article he wrote be cited in the "Works" section? None of these are notable on their own. This whole thing kinda feels like cross-wiki promo. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 19:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 06:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.