Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Higham

:{{la|Ruth Higham}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Ruth Higham}})

non notable former model WuhWuzDat 18:56, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

• Keep Evidently notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 06:31, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

• Delete Evidently not notable. Brumak (talk) 07:05, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
• Keep Fronted a notable advertising campaign, there is documented charitable work noted by a major source, various TV work, in addition to her newspaper modeling -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
• Keep as notable. Added various references. Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
• Delete - Does not appear to be a famous model--Effingcrazy (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

::Neither was Albert Einstein. It would help to address the notability criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (people) -- please see WP:JNN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk • contribs) 18:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

• Keep. Seems borderline, but notable enough per GNG. It is a bit ironic that we don't have a freely licensed photograph though. PlusPlusDave (talk) 23:56, 11 April 2011 (UTC) Striking, apparently banned editor--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:15, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.