Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth McDonald

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 17:52, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Ruth McDonald]]=

:{{la|Ruth McDonald}} ([{{fullurl:Ruth McDonald|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth McDonald}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

dismally fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT, gets zero coverage for her supposed acting career, only coverage is for being the wife of Andrew Strauss under her married name Ruth Strauss. [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=1990&as_user_hdate=2009&q=%22ruth+strauss%22+london&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&q=%22ruth+strauss%22+london&lnav=od&btnG=Go], WP:NOTINHERITED applies here. LibStar (talk) 14:16, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Fails notability in every way listed by the nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete: [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1395960/ This] is all that I can find of her acting career. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Joe Chill (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete not seeing any notability here.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 02:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep and move to Ruth Strauss. Meets WP:N. Why is coverage under her married name (and the name she uses in her profession now) somehow not worthy of supporting her independent notability? Using words like "dismally" "supposed" and "zero" when discussing a BLP article probably isn't necessary either. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 02:13, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

: there is close to no coverage for her acting career, being married to someone notable is not automatically notable. WP:NOTINHERITED, can you provide evidence of notability that doesn't make reference to Andrew Strauss? LibStar (talk) 02:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

::From a new Google news search of Ruth Strauss [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22ruth+strauss%22+-%22andrew+-strauss%22&num=10&as_price=p0&as_user_ldate=1980&as_user_hdate=2009&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=au&sa=N&start=0], all I've found is 3 articles that mention this Ruth Strauss [http://www.theage.com.au/news/sport/england-lays-down-law-to-crickets-wags/2006/09/14/1157827092177.html], [http://www.smh.com.au/news/sport/dont-expect-wag-tales-or-wagging-tails-from-english-tourists/2006/11/10/1162661897423.html], [http://www.smh.com.au/news/sport/cricket/forget-the-ashes-its-the-battle-of-the-wags/2009/05/29/1243456735310.html], all of them in the context of being married to Andrew Strauss the cricketer, can you tell me honestly she would get a mention if she was not married to Andrew? She may have an acting career but it's far from notable by Wikipedia standards. I see no way she meets WP:ENT, WP:BIO LibStar (talk) 12:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.