Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Johnston

:{{la|Ryan Johnston}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ryan_Johnston Stats])

:({{Find sources|Ryan Johnston}})

This is a disambiguation page that contains no entries with valid wikilinks. I asked for speedy when it had only two entries with no wikilinks, now we have six. But it seems there is not ONE Ryan Johnston notable enough to have a WP article, let alone two, so I don't see why we need a disambiguation article. ubiquity (talk) 20:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

• Speedy keep User:Ubiquity should read MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL. 6 valid entries and valid see also. Boleyn (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
• Keep per Boleyn. No valid reason to delete. Bearian (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

• Keep - I'm not seeing the issue. If some guy named Ryan Johnston is in a notable band, but isn't notable himself, you create a redirect. How you deal with a situation where a redirect is needed for multiple people with the same name if not through a disambig page? Bali88 (talk) 20:49, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

• Keep per MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

• Acquiesce - I read the noted articles. I stand corrected. But does this mean that everyone who is mentioned in an article, even if not sufficiently notable to have their own article, is entitled to have a redirect to that article under their own name, or an entry on the disambiguation page for that name if one exists? MOS:DABMENTION seems to suggest that. ubiquity (talk) 21:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
• :Yes, that's what it means. If only one of the mentions existed, a redirect to that mentioning article could be created. Since there are multiple such redirect targets, a disambiguation page is needed; it's effectively a soft redirect with multiple targets. -- JHunterJ (talk) 01:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.