Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Lawrie

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 05:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

=[[Ryan Lawrie]]=

:{{la|Ryan Lawrie}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ryan_Lawrie Stats])

:({{Find sources|Ryan Lawrie}})

No indication of external coverage. No references supplied to substantiate any facts asserted in the article. Does not presently meet WP:BLP requirements that all BLP articles must include references. Sole claim to meeting WP:MUSIC notability criteria is placement at spot 39 on the 2013 UK music charts - which my best efforts have failed to confirm as true thus far. Article appears to have been created by an affiliate/representative of the record label the artist in question is signed to. Searches attempted to verify chart placement included "2013 UK singles chart" and "2013 UK singles chart ryan lawrie". - Vianello (Talk) 03:46, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete the chart that he peaked on turns out to have been not an official UK singles chart, but the iTunes UK singles chart, a deprecated chart according to WP:BADCHARTS. Independent coverage seems to be limited to local press articles. Best of luck to him, and he may well turn out notable in time, but he's not there yet. Ruby Murray 14:41, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment: Thanks for looking into that. It's good to know it wasn't an outright fabrication at least. I feel a bit silly for missing that. - Vianello (Talk) 22:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep. I've added some new references for some press by local press, television and radio. I hope that you would reconsider the deletion of this page as I now believe it meets the following criteria for Notability(Music) section 1 Ross McFadyen (talk) 23:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑ScottywongUser talk:Scottywong 18:26, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.