Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. J. Vellenga

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 05:13, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

=[[S. J. Vellenga]]=

:{{la|S. J. Vellenga}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/S._J._Vellenga Stats])

:({{Find sources|S. J. Vellenga}})

Not notable. Self-published author of eBook. Autobiography with sources only from author's own personal website. Escape Orbit (Talk) 01:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete. Notability not established in accordance with WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. Lack of significant reliable, independent sources. Cindy(talk to me) 02:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete for now - Google News and Books (Google Australia) provided nothing relevant for a writer, however, I found results for a Dutch academic. My last resort was a regular Google search where I found two forum posts started by the subject himself, therefore not only would it be unreliable but primary as well. This young man certainly has potential but he has not gained enough attention (or any at all, as far as I'm aware) to be considered notable at this time. SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 01:39, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete article has one primary source and one Amazon source and it looks like the editor that created the article is the author himself.BeyondKneesReach (talk) 05:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. There are no reliable sources to show that this specific SJ Vellenga has notability. Other than primary sources and some unusable blog sources, there is not anything out there that covers him.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. I agree with Tokyogirl79 the sources are just not reliable enough. Crackingstack (talk) 11:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.