Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S3RL (2nd nomination)

:{{la|S3RL}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/S3RL_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|S3RL}})

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Claim of charting appears faked. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC) struck per Shaidar. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination, no independent reliable sources. Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me bro!} 06:45, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
• Delete as it stands, though if the chart claim can be substantiated I might change my view - David Gerard (talk) 12:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC) Shaidar delivers once again. Keep for actual charting single ... barely. The article is really not very good, but the band pass notability. Or the single does, really - David Gerard (talk) 12:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

• Delete, spent a while trying to find reference for chart claim. Could not substantiate; could not establish notability. Unfortunately delete as too soon.Aeonx (talk) 11:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
• Keep, Hung Medien ref needed [http://norwegiancharts.com/search.asp?search=%22Genre+Police%22&cat=s this] url (which I've now changed), I added a VG-list ref, [http://lista.vg.no/artist/s3rl-feat-lexi/singel/genre-police/6310 here], for same charting. Although the article used a poor url: the single did reach No. 10 on a national chart and hence the artist is notable per WP:MUSBIO#2.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 11:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.