Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SC-76 Thunderbolt

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. The nomination has been withdrawn. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 17:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

=[[:SC-76 Thunderbolt]]=

:{{la|SC-76 Thunderbolt}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SC-76_Thunderbolt Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|SC-76 Thunderbolt}})

Fails GNG. The one primary source used to cite this article is well short of RS, a google search found nothing attributable. Cavalryman (talk) 12:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Withdrawn – notability established by {{u|FOARP}}. Cavalryman (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC).

Keep per WP:NEXIST. Particularly these two sources: [https://nra.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2015Spring.pdf 1] (see the review on p. 10) [https://mashable.com/2014/08/26/ukrainians-arm-themselves-in-preparation-for-battle/?europe=true 2] (see the extended quote from Simon Schofield - a defence expert). There's also some coverage of the appearance of the rifle at IDEAS 2014 but I'm not sure if that is based on a press-release or not. I've added these references and a couple of other ones to the article - take a look. FOARP (talk) 13:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.