Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SHIFT word

=[[SHIFT word]]=

:{{la|SHIFT word}} ([{{fullurl:SHIFT word|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SHIFT word}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No third-party sources; fails Wikipedia:Notability. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:26, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete MERGE to Nissan. Nothing warrants a separate article on this. Not notable in and of itself. OfficeGirl (talk) 02:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC) Agree with Niteshift that this is not likely to be used as a search term enough for there to be a MERGE, but content should be incorporated into Nissan article. OfficeGirl (talk) 16:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. I simply can't see "SHIFT word" as a likely search term. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment: Because I contributed the article, I wouldn't vote. But the SHIFT_word is used in [http://www.nissan-global.com/EN/GLOBAL/ all over the world] and I think it's notable.--TTTNIS (talk) 08:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete An article with a marketing term is not encyclopedic; fails WP:GNG. A company may well invent a term and promote it, but we don't have to join in. No WP:SECONDARY sources have an analysis of the term. Johnuniq (talk) 10:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.