Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIR Stage37

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 01:53, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

=[[SIR Stage37]]=

:{{la|SIR Stage37}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|SIR Stage37}})

It has trivial mentions in Google news results, and I made good faith efforts to find non-trivial, significiant coverage, as per WP:CORPDEPTH. BizBash appears to be an unreliable, principally promotional source. There is no indication of notability besides the mention of it being voted the fifth most anticipated new venue, which is, of course, temporal. The article is written in a promotional fashion, as per WP:SOAP. Mephistophelian. (talk) 18:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

:Comment: article creator has a conflict of interest (WP:COI), as indicated by his/her username. Mephistophelian (talk) 18:41, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Few ghits and apparent conflict of interest. Feels like spam. noq (talk) 23:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete: Fundamentally promotional throughout, complete with pre-arranged shout-out to "preferred vender" (sic) (usually for discounts on equipment). 4 of 6 references are BizBash, a site of unknown relationship to its article subjects, split by major city, and likely to be churnalism. Other two are self-published. No evidence this is any more notable than any of the other of probably hundreds of open indoor spaces used for parties and small concerts in New York City. --Closeapple (talk) 03:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete No significant reliable source coverage. Qrsdogg (talk) 18:58, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.