Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMARTHINKING

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 08:16, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

=[[SMARTHINKING]]=

:{{la|SMARTHINKING}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMARTHINKING}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|SMARTHINKING}})

Not notable and no assertion of notability. Commercial promotion. Very recent set-up. No independent verification other than blogs and Media reports of press releases. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 10:47, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Delete - As this fails WP:N and is an extension of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straighterline which has already received a discussion and deleted. Maybe even a speedy as an attempted duplicate using a different name? - Pmedema (talk) 13:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Keep. A couple of articles about the subject in Inside Higher Ed (one of which is rather critical), one in a local paper, one in Washington Monthly, and one in eSchoolNews? Plus the blog, whatever that's worth. I think it meets WP:CORP easily. bobrayner (talk) 13:25, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Delete. Not notable, sourcing inadequate, commercial promotion. Figureofnine (talk) 14:44, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.