Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMON

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A bold piece of editing makes the discussion moot. Black Kite (t) (c) 20:34, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

=[[SMON]]=

:{{la|SMON}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMON}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|SMON}})

Does not seem to be a notable aspect of computer networking technology. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Merge content into RMON and replace with Disambiguate page for the "Japan SMON", "Oracle SMON", "RMON's SMON". Alinor (talk) 09:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, /ƒETCH COMMS / 00:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

I really don't think merging two articles that do not cite a single independent source between them is a sensible idea. And if the overall concept is not notable there is really no need for a dab page explaining the different subtypes, which at this time are all redlinks. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:33, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment It appears that someone has boldly converted this into a disambiguation page, rendering the discussion moot. - Dravecky (talk) 13:47, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.