Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMX (computer language)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|SMX (computer language)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SMX_(computer_language) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|SMX (computer language)}})

NN programming language, fails the GNG. No significant coverage in reliable sources found, and certainly none in the article. Notability tagged for over a decade. Prodded for these self-same things eleven years ago, without joy, and certainly without any sourcing added to the article. Enough's enough; this article's gone without reliable sources for FIFTEEN YEARS. Ravenswing 03:25, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:30, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

• Delete I was unable to secondary sourcing for this project and there are not any good alternatives to deletion that I can see. But nom, holding a grudge against an article for fifteen years, letting the rage grow within you until reach the breaking point, and then to lash out in all caps...That's not healthy. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 04:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

:*Comment: Nor would it be, if I'd discovered this article any earlier than, oh, two hours ago. My ire is instead directed towards the dozens of editors who made some edit to this article, without at any point troubling themselves to find reliable sourcing. Ravenswing 05:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Cannot find sources to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NSOFTWARE, and in terms of WP:NSOFTWARE I found only 1 book about it. -Lopifalko (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.