Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SM Center Muntinlupa
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to SM Supermalls. I believe there's enough discussion here to suggest a consensus for merging this into SM Supermalls or a list of same, but I don't believe there's sufficient discussion to show consensus on wider questions of other SM properties. j⚛e deckertalk 01:47, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
=[[SM Center Muntinlupa]]=
:{{la|SM Center Muntinlupa}} – (
:({{Find sources|SM Center Muntinlupa}})
fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. shopping mall are not inherently notable. created by an editor who went on a spree of creating Philipino mall articles. the only coverage I found is for directory listings for shops located in this mall and other routine coverage. LibStar (talk) 06:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I think malls(or at least regional malls which is what this is) are inherently notable now. This mall is around the same size as a mall I recently nominated for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbia Mall (Missouri). The attempt was a colossal failure. One person cited WP:OUTCOMES as a reason to keep which I thought was just another form of WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, but as you see the article was not deleted, so I guess this applies here as well. Another thing that came up was that I needed to provide evidence to prove that the mall wasn't notable which included making a trip to the areas local library to look at newspaper archives. Sounds ridiculous to me, but again the article wasn't deleted, so I guess this is the way deletion discussions work now (I hadn't participated in one since 07 or 08). Me5000 (talk) 21:41, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Merge along with all the others into List of SM Supermalls or into SM Supermalls leaving redirects. Malls may be inherently notable, but that doesn't mean each one has to have a separate article. Other wise Keep. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Merge I agree. I researched this topic briefly when the AfD first opened. I think this is a super center based on counting the number of stores from a list. I think a group article would serve the needs of the encyclopedia at this time. Unscintillating (talk) 22:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.