Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SM City

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to SM Prime Holdings. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 03:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

=[[:SM City]]=

:{{la|SM City}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SM_City Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|SM City}})

Article is almost the same as SM Prime Holdings and SM Supermalls. This article can be merged or deleted. BugMenn (talk) 19:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. BugMenn (talk) 13:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.. BugMenn (talk) 13:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Redirect to SM Prime Holdings. As pointed out, it's more or less the same entity: so per WP:ATD. — fortunavelut luna 16:33, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 June 30. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:08, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Redirect to SM Prime Holdings, which is what I originally suggested the nom do. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Redirect as above. Ajf773 (talk) 10:32, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.