Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SM City Tanza

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=SM City Tanza}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=SM City Tanza}})

Does not seem to meet WP:NGEO. A PROD has been contested and a draft has been declined – both concerning notability – but sourcing is limited to a few one-sentence mentions, both in the article and in a WP:BEFORE search. ComplexRational (talk) 15:16, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Philippines. ComplexRational (talk) 15:16, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
• Delete, passing mentions in sources, meets neither WP:NGEO or WP:GNG. Hughesdarren (talk) 02:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
• Delete as too soon for an upcoming mall. There is also a draft, which appears to have been submitted by another editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per WP:TOOSOON. The prod was taken down by the article creator (which I still have a problem with, despite being left a snarky message after restoring.) This is too soon, and doesn't yet pass GNG. SPF121188 ^{(talk this way) (contribs)} 12:50, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
• Delete for now per WP:TOOSOON. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:40, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
• Delete for now as the current status is "an upcoming mall" (meaning either under construction phase or on planning stage and not yet open to the public), definitely WP:TOOSOON. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 05:17, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per above. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.