Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SM Cyberzone
=[[SM Cyberzone]]=
:{{la|SM Cyberzone}} – (
:({{Find sources|SM Cyberzone}})
possible violation of WP:NOTDIRECTORY Rxlxm (talk) 03:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Sigh... their PR section keep making these articles.-- Obsidi♠n Soul 06:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete and salt. Similar articles have been deleted twice already as unambiguous advertising. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:41, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete and salt. Shameless advertising, no part of WP's job. No notability either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiswick Chap (talk • contribs) 16:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:CORP. Searching for reliable sources, I found an advert disguised as an article in the Sun Star. Insufficient to establish notability. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
:*Comment - Can you please be more specific, and state which part(s) of WP:NOTDIRECTORY you are referring to? This would help to clarify your statement. Northamerica1000 (talk) 12:56, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Blatant PR advertising, patent nonsense & unencyclopedic article. Keb25 (talk) 22:30, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.