Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPAIR

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 02:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

=[[SPAIR]]=

{{search for|Short-scar Periareolar-Inferior pedicle Reduction}}

{{search for|SPAIR}}

:{{la|SPAIR}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SPAIR Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|SPAIR}})

inadequate evidence for notability ; presumably an advertisement for the surgeon. DGG ( talk ) 17:33, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete as I also concur with DGG, nothing here at all for any applicable notability at all and nothing to suggest its own article. SwisterTwister talk 18:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

:*Note the sources that have been provided below after this !vote was posted. North America1000 20:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:09, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

  • ({{Find sources AFD|Short-scar Periareolar-Inferior pedicle Reduction}})
  • Keep – Meets WP:GNG. Upon discounting sources available in Google Scholar and Google books authored by the technique's creator, there are some sources available that provide significant coverage. See below for some of them. Also, note that the acronym "SPAIR" also refers to Spectral Adiabatic Inversion Recovery, which is not included in the sources below. Also, it's important to note that per WP:NEXIST, topic notability is not based upon the state of sourcing within articles. North America1000 12:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

References

  • [http://journals.lww.com/annalsplasticsurgery/Abstract/1999/04000/Early_Experience_with_SPAIR_Mammaplasty__A_Useful.14.aspx "Early Experience with SPAIR Mammaplasty: A Useful Alternative to Vertical Mammaplasty"]. Restifo, Richard J. MD (April 1999). Annals of Plastic Surgery. {{paywall}}
  • [https://books.google.com/books?id=CRzbklu1FFEC&pg=PA272&dq=%22Short-scar+Periareolar-Inferior+pedicle+Reduction%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjbrfaAqInNAhUT9mMKHWtAAZoQ6AEIRTAF#v=onepage&q=%22Short-scar%20Periareolar-Inferior%20pedicle%20Reduction%22&f=false Mastopexy and Breast Reduction: Principles and Practice]. Shiffman, Melvin A. (2009). Springer Science & Business Media. pages 272 –. {{paywall}}
  • [https://books.google.com/books?id=Ve9MBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA42&dq=%22Short-scar+Periareolar-Inferior+pedicle+Reduction%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjbrfaAqInNAhUT9mMKHWtAAZoQ6AEIQDAE#v=onepage&q=%22Short-scar%20Periareolar-Inferior%20pedicle%20Reduction%22&f=false Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery]. Thaller, Seth; Panthaki, Zubin (2012). CRC Press. p. 42.
  • [https://www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm=%22Short-scar+Periareolar-Inferior+pedicle+Reduction%22 "Reports Outline Hypertrophy Study Findings from Grand Rapids Medical Education Partners (the Short-Scar Periareolar Inferior Pedicle Reduction Technique in Severe Mammary Hypertrophy)"]. Medical Devices & Surgical Technology Week. February 8, 2015. Quote: "...and effective technique for breast reduction." For more information on this research see: The Short-Scar Periareolar Inferior Pedicle Reduction Technique in Severe Mammary Hypertrophy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2015;135(1..." {{paywall}}

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 04:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Speedy Keep – *Numerous* science journal articles on this, definitely meets WP:GNG.Deathlibrarian (talk) 04:18, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
  • delete along with Dennis C. Hammond which was created by same (probably paid) editor directly, without going through AfC. Would not have passed AfC due to lack of independent reliable secondary sources with substantive discussion. Jytdog (talk) 17:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 11:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.