Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SaFire

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

=[[SaFire]]=

:{{la|SaFire}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|SaFire}})

Subject is not sufficiently notable and article lacks reliable sources. The article is self-sourced or sourced via SEO channels of promotion. Advertising.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 05:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete. The remarkable thing is that a [http://www.google.com/search?q=SaFire&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#sclient=psy&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&tbs=nws:1%2Car%3A1&q=SaFire+hooping&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.1,or.&fp=bc3757e578a738f7 Google search] for "SaFire" and "hooping" finds more hits for William Safire (even in Dutch!) than for our subject (for whom we find two, [http://www.edmontonsun.com/entertainment/2010/06/01/14208101.html] and [http://www.edmontonsun.com/news/edmonton/2010/06/02/14232851.html]). Drmies (talk) 05:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.