Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacha Petshi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW and procedural concerns. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

=[[Sacha Petshi]]=

:{{la|Sacha Petshi}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Sacha Petshi}})

Dear Admin, This might not be notable. Please review. Thanks AKS (talk) 10:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

  • petshi is notable ,he made appearence for Top French league — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesueur878 (talk • contribs)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep - the quickest of Google searches would have shown that this player meets WP:NFOOTBALL, as confirmed by [http://www.soccerway.com/players/sacha-petshi/88783/ this] (among many others). Article needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 13:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep. He has played in a fully professional league, satisfying WP:NFOOTY. – Kosm1fent 13:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep{{spaced ndash}}The nomination doesn't contain a valid rationale for deletion, per criterion listed at WP:DEL-REASON. The nominator seems unsure about the topic's notability, rather than advancing notions why the topic isn't notable. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep per User:GiantSnowman. The nominator must take more care in future before proposing articles for AfD. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 19:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep. Per WP:NFOOTBALL. Could do with an infobox to present the player's appearances and so help demonstrate the article's claim to notability. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.