Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SafePeak

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Not taking the ATD, given the lack of enthusiasm for it and the strong possibility that it also does not meet WP:NCORP. asilvering (talk) 14:15, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

=[[:SafePeak]]=

:{{la|1=SafePeak}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=SafePeak}})

A :WP:SPA article on an IT company which was active 2007-14 when it was acquired by :ScaleBase, itself then acquired by :ScaleArc. I placed a :WP:PROD on the article in 2015, which was removed by an IP, after which the original article creator posted [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AllyD&diff=prev&oldid=675131301 this message] on my Talk page. The partnership announcement references fall under :WP:CORPTRIV and I am not seeing evidence that the firm attained notability. A redirect to :ScaleBase is a possibility, but that article may itself be suitable for AFD, and the prior Prod probably means that an AFD is the better process. AllyD (talk) 08:47, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Israel. AllyD (talk) 08:47, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:29, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete as it looks like a promotional page. Otherwise move to draft, but a lot of work would need to be done. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 11:53, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete: agree with nom - also not able to find much after few searches and current source link are are not working. Asteramellus (talk) 12:15, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

:*Delete Cannot find much in teh way of coverage and info available is WP:CORPTRIV as noted in the nom. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:23, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Redirect to ScaleBase. This is technically the correct solution under ATD and PRESERVE as the parent has an article that was not nominated alongside. ScaleBase could have been nominated, as it is most likely also NN. gidonb (talk) 12:51, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
:I would agree if there were evidence that the two firms had a parent-subsidiary relationship. Here, it appears ScaleBase bought up IP on SafePeak's products. The only source I can find is [https://www.linknovate.com/affiliation/safepeak-91147147/all/ this listing] which seems to indicate SafePeak's board making a closure decision separately after ScaleBase's demise, so I think the companies were distinct and so need separate AFD consideration. AllyD (talk) 13:02, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Not needed. Even what you describe is a significant relationship and with the existing mention (and no misspellings), it meets the (low) bar for a redirect. This takes priority over delete by ATD, PRESERVE, and CHEAP. You mentioned the option yourself: {{tq|A redirect to :ScaleBase is a possibility}}. gidonb (talk) 14:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.