Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safuu

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Safuu}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Safuu}})

This appears to fail WP:NCORP. The sources in the article all fail to meet the requirements of WP:ORGCRIT:

• The [https://safuuprotocol.gitbook.io/safuuprotocol/safuu-token Gitbook] [https://safuuprotocol.gitbook.io/safuuprotocol/safuu-token sources] are not independent.
• The [https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/02/03/2378815/0/en/Safuu-Launches-Crypto-s-Highest-Paying-DeFi-Yield-of-382-945-APY.html Globenewswire source] is a press release.
• The [https://kalkinemedia.com/news/cryptocurrency/up-over-200-in-4-days-why-is-safuu-protocol-grabbing-attention Kalkine Media Australia source] is from an "investor relations" company as opposed to a news organization.
• The content of the [https://www.inlifemagazine.com/2022/04/bryan-legend/ In Life Mag article] fails WP:ORGIND being that it's a primary source interview with the company founder.
• [https://cryptocreed.com/safuu-highest-sustainable-fixed-auto-staking-compounding-protocol/ CryptoCreed content] is not considered reliable for purposes of notability, owing to WP:NCRYPTO.
• [https://usethebitcoin.com/can-token-burning-really-help-defi-protocols-solve-the-looming-issue-of-interest-inflation/ Use The Bitcoin content] is not considered reliable for purposes of notability, owing to WP:NCRYPTO.
• [https://thenewscrypto.com/how-safuu-protocol-is-aiming-to-make-defi-more-scalable-and-sustainable/ The News Crypto content] is not considered reliable for purposes of notability, owing to WP:NCRYPTO.
• [https://teknoet.com/top-3-defi-projects-worth-considering-in-2022/ Jannah News content] appears to be a crypto blog, so it's once again not reliable for NCORP purposes owing to NCRYPTO.
• [https://safuu.medium.com/safuu-blockchain-in-2023-1732abb89d6c Medium] [https://safuu.medium.com/safuu-airlines-discovery-is-born-320c7b63bb21 content] that is both user-generated and non-independent fails to satisfy WP:ORGCRIT in multiple ways.
• The [https://www.btcc.net/2022/04/07/team-hard-racing-reveals-safuu-com-title-partnership/ BTCC source] is a press release.
• The [https://www.btcc.net/2022/04/07/team-hard-racing-reveals-safuu-com-title-partnership/ Team HARD] source is a press release.
• The [https://www.touringcartimes.com/2022/04/12/nicolas-hamilton-remains-team-hard-third-btcc-campaign/ Touring Car Times] gives only a trivial mention of the digital currency's website.

In addition to all of the above sources failing to satisfy WP:ORGCRIT, I'm not able to find sources on the internet that do. As such, I believe that this article should be deleted for failing to meet the relevant notability guideline of NCORP. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 04:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Finance, and Australia. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 04:59, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• Comment as nom. Please also note that Draft:Safuu was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Safuu&diff=1083242336&oldid=1083240316 draftified] one minute before the draft creator [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Safuu&oldid=1083242470 copied and pasted] the draft article's content into the mainspace. There doesn't appear to be any attribution cleanup required, but there might be some other post-AFD cleanup that's necessary. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 05:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. Not noteworthy. Lead seems promotional: {{tq|at the time of its introduction, set the record for the highest annual percentage yield in the decentralized finance space, with an APY of 383,025.80%}} 0xDeadbeef (T C) 22:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: insufficient discussion, relisting for at least a week to attract more policy based arguments.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MaxnaCarter (talk) 02:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

• Delete - the sourcing is generally quite poor. Mostly primary sources or poorly written blogs, as highlighted above. A Google search doesn't turn up anything significant. Fails WP:GNG. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:39, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. Also searching some databases primarily finds the identical PR piece, "Safuu - Launches Crypto's Highest Paying DeFi Yield of 382,945% APY", and nothing approaching any sort of notability at this time. Skynxnex (talk) 14:53, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.