Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagacious Consultants, LLC

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:46, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

=[[Sagacious Consultants, LLC]]=

:{{la|Sagacious Consultants, LLC}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sagacious_Consultants,_LLC Stats])

:({{Find sources|Sagacious Consultants, LLC}})

It looks like it fails the general notability guideline. Googling with search term "Sagacious Consultants" turns up [http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/relationships-and-special-occasions/bestbridal/announcements/engagement/alford-leible/article_a1014639-0e1b-5598-a73a-efe52cecba04.html one passing mention] from Google News, no hits from Google News's archives, and a few false positive Google Books hits, as is typical. Only primary sources are currently present in the article. CtP (t • c) 18:18, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Comment – Page was created not that long ago, creator may have not yet gotten a chance to assert notability. I'll wait to decide. — kikichugirl inquire 18:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete Currently the article provides no evidence of notability, and is written in a promotional style, e.g. "Sagacious Consultants currently offers three unique service lines" and "Sagacious Consultants values corporate citizenship", not to mention the somewhat tautological "Sagacious provides a wide breadth of EMR consulting services.." (emphasis added). AndrewWTaylor (talk) 19:48, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.