Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salming Sports

:{{la|Salming Sports}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Salming_Sports Stats])

:({{Find sources|Salming Sports}})

Fail WP:CORP, no independent secondary sources provided. JMHamo (talk) 01:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

• delete. i agree with nom. --Ysangkok (talk) 19:36, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk · contribs) 18:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

---

• Keep I am not even going to go into notability here sence there clearly is one and a big one. You cant go into any shop in Sweden and not see Salming products especially underwear. Still this article is not a good one to be nice. I am suprized the writer didnt write a bigger one or added more sources and reffs. There are tons of them on the net. The article itself is a keep becouse of its notability BUT needs to be seriously rewroten. As it is now its bad.Stepojevac (talk) 15:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑ScottywongUser talk:Scottywong 04:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

---

::Removed accidental double-relist; actual relist log is for 15 February 2014 --slakr^\ talk / 11:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

• Keep - even though the article is at the very best a stub, it is a notable subject. Salming sports is one of swedens most known brands when it comes to underwear.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 February 21. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 03:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This AfD suffered in relisting, being relisted to the 15th - then to the 18th, but then auto-added to the 21st's log, putting it in both the 15th's and the 21'st logs. I've relisted it to the 23rd's, where it can now run out to a conclusion.

---

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.