Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Dodson

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 06:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Sam Dodson]]=

:{{la|Sam Dodson}} ([{{fullurl:Sam Dodson|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Dodson}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Possible violation of WP:BLP1E. Dodson appears to be notable solely for his arrest, and for not complying with authorities. (And also for complaining about the conditions of his jail) Aditya ^α _ß 15:02, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable protestor who fails WP:BIO Niteshift36 (talk) 03:43, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment Whilst I agree that Sam is not noticeable in himself, his actions are, so if deleted, the content of this article should be added to Free State Project#Civil disobedience, or similar. --bjwebb (talk) 15:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Why not WP:BEBOLD and do it yourself? Niteshift36 (talk) 01:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete appears to be a nn protester; the merge suggested by bjwebb appears to have been completed. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 05:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete article has no rationale any longer in the light of above proposed merger--AssegaiAli (talk) 09:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.