Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Puttick

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted, upon author request (G7). Jamie^☆S93 18:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Sam Puttick]]=

:{{la|Sam Puttick}} ([{{fullurl:Sam Puttick|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Puttick}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Very unfortunate - but WP:ONEVENT Passportguy (talk) 17:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

KeepI've been looking around Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and there's one called Wikipedia:Notability. It says a subject is notable if the subject has received lots of reliable independent and secondary coverage, which Puttick has in mountains. Whereforeone (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

:*Have you read WP:ONEEVENT? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

::Comment to be included here a person but be notable. I cannot see that he did anything notable himself. If you can source significant coverage on the parent's actions then you could create an article on that. Passportguy (talk) 18:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.