Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Rizk

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Sam Rizk and votes below. Materialscientist (talk) 04:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

=[[Sam Rizk]]=

:{{la|Sam Rizk}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Sam Rizk}})

Plastic surgeon who has published a couple of journal articles. I don't think he qualifies as notable per WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NOTRESUME. —Eustress ^talk 19:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Comment - wasn't this taken care of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dr._Sam_Rizk here?] Otherwise Delete per nom. Karl 334 ^Talk-^-Contribs 19:09, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Delete, oh for gosh sakes, this was just deleted, still doesn't meet WP:ACADEMIC/WP:PROF, this time should both be salted? There is nothing in our notability policy on academics that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sam_Rizk&diff=486670300&oldid=486668688 has anything to do with the notion that he meets notability because of a journal article;] why was this not speedily deleted and salted ? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:09, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Delete and salt per nom and per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Sam Rizk. Just one of about a thousand nose job salesman wanting to advertise on Wikipedia. Fails WP:ACADEMIC and WP:BIO. Scopecreep (talk) 04:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.