Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Dunn

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

=[[Samantha Dunn]]=

:{{la|Samantha Dunn}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Samantha Dunn}})

Bio, possibly vanity. Seems to fail WP:POLITICIAN. A number of Google news hits but they only mention the subject in passing. Also a number of web hits but they don't pass WP:N either. Miracle Pen (talk) 02:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 03:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 03:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Delete The only sources provided are not independent of the subject. The subject appears to be a garden variety local government politician with no claim to meet WP:POLITICIAN. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 04:13, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete per Mattinbgn. No independent reliable sources, and no indication of notability — especially since (as far as I can tell) she lost her race in the 2010 Victoria state election. Richwales (talk · contribs) 02:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. WWGB (talk) 10:00, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete per nom and Mattinbgn - falls well short of WP:POLITICIAN and appears to have been created by a promotional account. Orderinchaos 21:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.