Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Dzhundrin

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 20:34, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

=[[Samuel Dzhundrin]]=

:{{la|Samuel Dzhundrin}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Samuel Dzhundrin}})

nearly unreadable, no references except for the basic data Steinhfer (talk) 23:25, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Keep. Bishops of major churches are usually considered to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Speedy Keep and close{{spaced ndash}}The nomination's basis appears to be upon content within the article, rather than upon the availability of reliable sources per source searching. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Keep. I have also fixed the unreadability in the article, although it still needs a bit of copy-editing. User:A412 (Talk * C) 06:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.