Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Miguel Eskrima

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources have been added to verify notability. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[San Miguel Eskrima]]=

:{{la|San Miguel Eskrima}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|San Miguel Eskrima}})

A non notable marial art without sources to back up notabilty Dwanyewest (talk) 19:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

:Keep, definitely a notable art.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 15:12, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

::Do you have a reliable source that shows this art is notable? Astudent0 (talk) 18:40, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

:::Does 7 work?--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 16:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

::::It does for me. Astudent0 (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Astudent0 (talk) 18:40, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete I found no independent sources that support this art's notability. Astudent0 (talk) 18:24, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

:Keep thanks to Mike's efforts. Astudent0 (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete - Agree with Astudent0 Shadowjams (talk) 11:13, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep The references that were just added may not, individually, be "significant coverage", but they're enough to convince me the article is worth keeping. Papaursa (talk) 21:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.