Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandu Ciorba

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:45, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Sandu Ciorba]]=

:{{la|Sandu Ciorba}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sandu_Ciorba Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sandu Ciorba}})

No sources Silver Master (talk) 15:35, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

I added more links where I found informations, it's good now? Luki1223 (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete none of the sources listed are reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:44, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

These guys are the kind of great obscure culture that should be kept on wikipedia. They have some great songs as well as amusing ones. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.67.126 (talk) 02:33, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete Non-notable, no sources, fails WP:MUSIC, and being part of "obscure culture" is no reason to keep an article. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 21:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Comment He's cited in this [https://books.google.ch/books?id=XXXrAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Sandu+Ciorba%22&dq=%22Sandu+Ciorba%22&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiTupSuyprTAhUJJcAKHcRSBDYQ6AEIKzACthis scholarly work] about Romanian sucultures. Passing mentions ([https://books.google.ch/books?id=zEuFDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT356&dq=%22Sandu+Ciorba%22&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiTupSuyprTAhUJJcAKHcRSBDYQ6AEIGjAA#v=onepage&q=%22Sandu%20Ciorba%22&f=false][https://books.google.ch/books?id=g_kUAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&dq=%22Sandu+Ciorba%22&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiTupSuyprTAhUJJcAKHcRSBDYQ6AEIIzAB#v=onepage&q=%22Sandu%20Ciorba%22&f=false]) in German books about Romania attest his popularity. Plenty of Google hits. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VB4NExi5uXs This video] has almost 20 million hits on Youtube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iUGfURqyhs This one] more than 27 million. Not bad. I suspect Romanian Roma artists have a hard time getting into "reliable" sources. 84.73.134.206 (talk) 19:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Comment If the subject was really that popular, he'd warrant more than just "passing mentions" in a couple foreign-language books (one of which is in Romanian), nor does the number of YouTube views someone's video has indicate subject notability. It has nothing to do whatsoever with a perceived bias. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 01:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.