Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Kozer
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —☮JAaron95 Talk 14:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
=[[Sarah Kozer]]=
:{{la|Sarah Kozer}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Sarah Kozer}})
A runner up to a reality show is now normally considered notable. Spartaz Humbug! 07:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguinHangout 11:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguinHangout 11:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - in addition to the nominator rationale, these [http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-247671.html][http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-114112879.html][http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-73588826.html][http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-98001939.html] should meet the notability guidelines. Really, do a WP:BEFORE. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, a bit reluctantly. Nominator is right on the general principle, but Kozer became notorious just before reliable US media outlets realized that spotting self-promoting exhibitionists with skeletons in their closets on reality TV was routine rather than legitimately noteworthy. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 11:55, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep - {{u|Hullaballoo Wolfowitz}} hits the nail on the head. I don't want to, but she appears to meet the notability requirements for all the wrong reasons. Onel5969 TT me 13:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.