Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Pulliam Bailey

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Sarah Pulliam Bailey}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Sarah Pulliam Bailey}})

A search provides no evidence of notability, under WP:NJOURNALIST or any other notability criterion. WP:RS and WP:BEFORE show extensive published material by the subject in RS but virtually no RS biographical coverage about the subject. Also no evidence of significant awards that themselves have notability per WP:ANYBIO. No available evidence of notability under WP:JOURNALIST. Being related to notable family members is not itself notable (WP:BLPFAMILY) nor is having interviewed notable people.--Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Religion, Christianity, Illinois, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
• Redirect to Eugene S. Pulliam, if that follows policy. I looked at this a few years ago during an editathon related to either Indiana or women in journalism topics, but not sure there's much out there beyond her many bylines and some citations to her work ... maybe others will find more from the intervening years... Caro7200 (talk) 17:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
• :I don't see how this redirect can work. Review the sources and run a BEFORE!. BE BOLD! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

:An article about a journalist that list the parents (does it now makes it BLP WP:BIOFAMILY). I disagree completely with you!. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

• Keep: This article about a Journalist passes WP:GNG (that she has worked in various news platforms—which goes on media about her entering). Meets WP: JOURNALIST as a creative professional, whose works has appeared on WSJ, New Yorker, etwx. Cited notably without inherence of interviewing the American President Barack Obama.Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• :Comment I don't think I understand what you're getting at, but the act of interviewing a high-profile person and publishing articles or working for national publications does not make one notable per WP:JOURNALIST. The criteria are:
• :

  • The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors; or
  • The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique; or
  • The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series); or
  • The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

• :While I think she's an excellent journalist personally, I can find no independent coverage of Pulliam Bailey that provides evidence for any of these criteria. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• ::Can't you see my striking? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 01:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

:Delete. Not much focusing on her career or actions in specific. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

:Delete: as mentioned in the nomination, does not satisfy any of the notability criteria in WP:JOURNALIST. Bendegúz Ács (talk) 10:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.