Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Stage

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Sarah Stage]]=

:{{la|Sarah Stage}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sarah_Stage Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sarah Stage}})

WP:BLP1E - that event being gossip-magazine coverage of her appearance while pregnant. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:58, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Keep - Coverage in People Magazine and on ABC News is enough for GNG. WOPR (talk) 01:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:40, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Delete--no, that kind of coverage is not enough per GNG. Delete: no significant discussion, nothing here of any lasting importance. Drmies (talk) 02:55, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete Editing could fix the WP:BLPPRIVACY issue with the birth records/possible-but-not-confirmed family information, the unbylined TMZ source, the obvious WP:GOSSIP, the selective discussion of her ethnic background, and the unsourced Fashion Nova claim inserted by the creator of the Fashion Nova article. But what's left would be, at best, WP:BLP1E, just like the nominator said. Bakazaka (talk) 17:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

:: {{reply|Bakazaka}} Many sources have described her as “Costa Rican model” even though she’s from California, with some vague, unspecified “European” heritage as well. So why anyone would put something as general as “European” is insignificant. I don’t see how it’s relevant here when it’s simply a biographical detail given in the source. With regard to Fashion Nova, another irrelevant minutiae, I created the article out of annoyance of it being bombarded by it in the media every 5 minutes yet it not having a Wikipedia article. I could give less of a damn about the company at large and don’t see how creating two independent articles is mutually exclusive. Fashion Nova’s business model is to pay “super” influencers like Kylie Jenner to promote their promote their products, along with thousands of people like Stage. Anyone with the capability to google can easily look into that. It’s just funny how all of a sudden WP:NEXIST isn’t applied here. Trillfendi (talk) 19:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.