Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satellite Flight: Journey to Mother Moon

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 05:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

=[[Satellite Flight: Journey to Mother Moon]]=

:{{la|Satellite Flight: Journey to Mother Moon}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Satellite_Flight:_Journey_to_Mother_Moon Stats])

:({{Find sources|Satellite Flight: Journey to Mother Moon}})

Doesn't meet notability guidelines for albums and musical works, album is not released (per WP:CRYSTAL). ColonelHenry (talk) 03:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

What do you mean it doesnt meet notability guidlines, the actual artist has confirmed the release of the album, that it actually exists, and numerous sites have confirmed it. The official tweet of the artist is not enough proof of that?. User:Alexandros (talk) 14:39, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 05:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


  • Keep — Has received enough coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:NALBUMS and not be violating WP:CRYSTAL. However, the article does need to be expanded. STATic message me! 07:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep. The article is not affected by WP:CRYSTAL as it's existence is verified by numerous independent secondary sources. The album is notable as per WP:NALBUMS and will only become more notable after it's release. N4 (talk) 03:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Definitely notable. Koala15 (talk) 20:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.