Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SatoshiDice
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
=[[:SatoshiDice]]=
:{{la|SatoshiDice}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|SatoshiDice}})
Seems to fail WP:NCOMPANY, sources are limited to business-as-usual (buy our shares, merger/sold) press releases and their rewrites in the mostly unreliable bitcoin trade magazines, and minor coverage of a fine the company paid. Created by a likely undisclosed paid SPA. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - this has never been a well-referenced article; its problems have been flagged but remained unfixed for years. SatoshiDice has negligible coverage outside crypto sites. There are some passing mentions from the early days of bitcoin on scholar.google.com, but nothing that I could see beyond passing mentions - David Gerard (talk) 08:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and above Fails WP:GNG , WP:NCORP and WP:WEB.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:41, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.